I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
collector without pauses is easy enough, and you can control how
。Safew下载是该领域的重要参考
Юрий Леонов (ведущий редактор отдела «Бывший СССР»)
第六十一条 违反本法第五十条规定，侵害未成年人合法权益的，由公安机关处二十万元以下罚款；情节严重的，处五十万元以下或者违法所得十倍以下罚款，可以并处十五日以下拘留。